Disclosed

Scott W. Bray

Deputy Director of Naval Intelligence

Claims listed
17
Checked
1 of 17
Video
1
Background checked
29 Sep 2026
How Scott W. Bray's claims fared when checked

Our assessment

The site's assessmentChecked 29 Sep 2026

A career civilian naval intelligence officer whose public UAP-related statements come entirely from a single, measured, on-the-record congressional appearance. His testimony is consistently reported as candid and cautious, explicitly declining to claim either extraterrestrial origin or a debunking of every case. No source found disputes his credentials, his account of the video he showed Congress, or his personal conduct.

Credentials

Verified credentials

  • Deputy Director of Naval Intelligence and Director, Naval Intelligence Activity, from January 2020
  • Acting Director of Naval Intelligence, August-December 2023
  • B.S. International Affairs, Georgia Tech, 1996 (secondary-source corroborated)
  • M.A. International Affairs, Columbia University, 1998 (secondary-source corroborated)
  • Senior Executive Service since 2007; prior roles as ONI China Senior Intelligence Officer, Special Assistant to the US Defense Attaché in Beijing, Principal Deputy National Intelligence Officer for Military Issues (ODNI), and National Intelligence Manager for East Asia

Unverified or disputed credentials

  • None found

Expertise

Within their expertise

  • naval intelligence
  • military intelligence analysis
  • East Asia/China intelligence

Topics outside their expertise

  • None noted

Claims by video

17
  • Unverified9:08Official document

    The UAP Task Force was established in August 2020, directed by then-Deputy Secretary of Defense David Norquist, within the Department of the Navy, building on the Navy's earlier efforts to respond to aviator reports of unidentified objects in training ranges.

    almost two years ago in august of 2020 deputy secretary defense nordquist directed the establishment of the unidentified aerial phenomena task force within the department of the navy

  • Unverified13:13Official document

    The UAP Task Force's database has grown to approximately 400 reports, up from the 144 covered in the June 2021 ODNI preliminary assessment.

    the uap task force database has now grown to contain approximately 400 reports the stigma has been reduced

  • Unverified13:13Official document

    ODNI's model for resolving UAP incidents sorts them into five potential explanatory categories: airborne clutter, natural atmospheric phenomena, U.S. government/industry developmental programs, foreign adversary systems, or an 'other' catch-all bin.

    if and when individual uap incidents are resolved they likely fall into one of five potential explanatory categories airborne clutter natural atmospheric phenomena us government or u.s industry developmental programs foreign adversary systems or a other bin

  • Unverified15:14Multi sensor

    Two triangle-shaped-object videos, recorded off different coasts in different years, are assessed with 'reasonable confidence' to be unmanned aerial systems (drones); the triangular appearance results from an artifact of viewing the light source through night-vision goggles recorded by an SLR camera. The second incident was corroborated by other Navy assets that independently observed unmanned systems nearby.

    we're now reasonably confident that these triangles correlate to unmanned aerial systems in the area the triangular appearance is a result of light passing through the night vision goggles and then being recorded by an slr camera

  • Unverified28:25Official document

    DoD has a formal reporting protocol for aviators: after landing, the pilot preserves sensor data, files a detailed report (location, altitude, speed, observations, sensor data) with their intelligence officer, and the report routes both to the operational chain of command and to the UAP Task Force database, sometimes triggering aviator follow-up interviews.

    the first thing that aviator would do after landing as a part of their normal debriefing is they would contact their intelligence officer... that report is filed it goes two places

  • Unverified33:17Single sensor

    A spherical, reflective object was recorded passing near the cockpit of a U.S. Navy F/A-18 in a training range; Bray states DoD has no explanation for this specific object.

    what you see here is aircraft that is operating in a u.s navy training range that has observed a spherical object in that area and as they fly by it they take a video i do not have an explanation for what this specific object is

  • Supported34:18Official document

    Of the 144 UAP reports in the 2021 ODNI preliminary assessment (2004-2021), roughly 80 were recorded on multiple sensors/instruments.

    for the majority of incidents we had in last year's report the majority had multi-sensor data

    Our check Confirmed against the actual ODNI Preliminary Assessment (June 25, 2021): of the 144 reports reviewed (Nov 2004-March 2021), 80 involved observation with multiple sensors, which the task force cited as increasing confidence that the objects were physical rather than sensor artifacts.

    Sources odni.gov

  • Unverified36:23Unsourced

    DoD/ODNI is not aware of any foreign adversary capable of moving an object without a discernible means of propulsion.

    i would say that we're not aware of any adversary that can move an object without discernible means of propulsion

Their video

1