Randall Nickerson

Archival footage used in the documentary/trailer states the Ariel School sighting occurred on 19 September 1994.

ariel school 19th september 94

The commonly cited figure of 62 children reflects only those who drew pictures during the 1994 investigation, not the full number of witnesses.

the number 62 came from the number of kids that drew drawings so there were a lot more than that

Nickerson estimates at least 100 children actually witnessed the event, though only those who drew pictures were formally counted.

at least a hundred kids in my opinion

Nickerson says the documentary took approximately 15 years to complete, from roughly 2007-2008 to its 2022 release.

it took it'll be 20 at 15 years in september of this year

Zulu and Shona traditional knowledge-keepers (sangomas/nyangas), including one named as 'Credo', reportedly told Nickerson these beings were historically regarded as gods, reinterpreted over roughly the last 50 years as extraterrestrial life once their use of technology was recognized.

they used to think they were gods this is what was told to me directly until they came to a different conclusion that they were another form of wildlife from another planet

One child who later had a close encounter with a being had reportedly experienced seizures shortly before the incident.

i can speak to one specifically and it was seizures

Nickerson argues against a mass-hysteria explanation on the grounds that the children's descriptions did not match contemporary media UFO tropes and stayed consistent across many separate interviewers over decades.

if they were going to make up a story that was so consistent they wouldn't have come up with that as such a unique story

Children consistently described the beings' movement as gliding or floating, unlike normal earth gravity.

gravity did not seem like it was like earth gravity when they moved

While children on average reported two beings, Nickerson says testimony and drawing evidence suggest four were present.

there's evidence that i've found that there were more than that there were four

A BBC reporter (heard as 'Tim Leach') was the first journalist on the scene and gathered testimony from many witnesses.

tim leach was the reporter for bbc when he was the first one on the scene and he had so many people so many witnesses

Nickerson applied a self-imposed rule requiring at least three independent sources before including any detail in the documentary.

you gotta validate you gotta get at least three sources to go with it i learned that from the bbc reporter

Children reported two distinct sounds associated with the encounter: a buzzing/humming 'bee' sound and a high-pitched flute-like sound.

there was this buzz that was like connected to the concept of bees and then there was this flute sound

A witness heard on the transcript as 'Natasha' described the craft's sound as a 'mechanical bee sound'.

she said it sounded like a mechanical b sound

Witnesses converged on a description of large eyes and heads, child-sized stature, and a full black reflective body covering resembling a diving suit, with an opaque white-to-pinkish visible face.

from neck down they were in black like a shiny reflective diving suit type of thing

One child witness described one being as having visible hair while a second being from the same encounter had none, a detail even John Mack reportedly questioned and Nickerson says he cannot explain.

one had what appeared to be looked like hair and then the other one didn't have any at all

The closest child witnesses were reportedly within about 10 meters of a being, while the furthest witness who saw something was roughly 400 yards away on a large playground.

the furthest away a child i mean it's probably 400 yards away that's a huge playground

The craft was generally described as disc- or oval-shaped; children from villages with less exposure to Western UFO imagery instead described it as 'two baskets, one upside down'.

the native kids described it as two baskets upside down one upside down and one that's how they describe it

Ground disturbance (burn marks, swirled grass) was reported at the site in 1994, but per Nickerson these marks did not persist and were never independently tested with instruments such as radiation detectors.

initially it was reported that there were burn marks on the ground but whatever happened they didn't stay on the ground

An unnamed National Geographic wildlife cameraman who worked with John Mack's crew reportedly told Nickerson the site's wildlife (including termite activity) showed effects he had never seen in his career.

whatever happened there because he walked that property he'd never seen nature behave that way

Children reported receiving a telepathic communication interpreted as a warning about environmental destruction and about not going too deep into technology.

the students said they were told telepathically about saving the environment or that we shouldn't get involved and go too deep into technology

Nickerson says additional children privately told him, off camera, of their own telepathic contact experiences, out of fear of ridicule, so the full scope of such reports is not documented on film.

there's definitely more than a few kids had that experience that's for sure

Nickerson confirms John Mack asked leading questions of the child witnesses during his interviews, but argues the children's specific answers often did not follow the premise of the question, which he offers as evidence against contamination.

their answers didn't revolve around anything that he even proposed like did you hear a buzzing sound and the kid's like no i heard a flute

Nickerson states he personally experienced an alleged alien-contact event around age 10, and again around age 23, which led him to seek out John Mack before making the film.

it happened again when i was in my 20s 23

Nickerson appeared on The Oprah Winfrey Show in 1994, by his account a few months before the Ariel School incident, alongside John Mack and other self-described abductees; he characterizes the interview as condescending toward the guests.

it was early oprah it was actually 94

Nickerson says Oprah Winfrey recently posted that 1994 episode online without publicly explaining why, and he does not know why he in particular was included among the six or seven original panelists.

she put it online there was seven of us i think all together six or seven of us

Nickerson states abduction/contact experiencers were historically given psychiatric labels such as schizophrenic or bipolar, but that the experience itself was never adopted as its own diagnostic category in the DSM.

it's in the dsm-4 dsm-5 where they don't really classify it because they never came to any conclusion that it was a mental illness