Disclosed

Gemini 4 Experiment Debriefing, 1967

Date
1965-06-03/07
Place
Low Earth Orbit
Record
Pentagon file
Assessment
Not assessed
Evidence strength
467 case pages by decade; this one falls in 1960s with 49 othersAll cases

What was reported

A 224-page experiment-focused Gemini 4 debrief (scientific/technical, question-and-answer format with ground personnel) covering airglow-layer photography and photometry experiments, rendezvous with the spent booster, and EVA hardware. Extensive discussion of the 'night airglow,' 'twilight glow' and 'day glow' bands is technical experiment data, not an anomaly. One passing exchange about approaching a tumbling satellite/booster and 'putting a man aboard' to inspect it discusses hypothetical future rendezvous procedure, not an actual sighting. No unidentified-object content was found in the sampled text.

What officials concluded

No conclusion stated

The file gives no official explanation.

Agency
NASA
Released in

Evidence profile

Sensors2 of 9
  • Yes: Visual
  • No: Infrared
  • No: Radar
  • No: Video
  • Yes: Photo
  • No: Film
  • No: Audio
  • No: Night vision
  • No: Other sensor
Witnessescount not stated
  • No: Civilian
  • No: Military aircrew
  • No: Military ground
  • No: Airline crew
  • No: Sensor operator
  • No: Law enforcement
  • No: Scientist
  • No: Astronaut
  • No: Intelligence official
  • No: Other
Shapenot stated
  • No: Light only
  • No: Orb or sphere
  • No: Disc
  • No: Triangle
  • No: Cylinder
  • No: Cube
  • No: Other shape
Effectsnone reported
  • No: Physiological
  • No: Physical trace
  • No: Electromagnetic
  • No: Sound
  • No: Silent

Why this rating No sighting or anomalous-object content found in the sampled sections; the recurring keyword hits are airglow-layer science experiment discussion and hardware/procedure Q&A, not observations of an unexplained craft.

As described in the file

Sensors
Visual, photometer/photography (airglow experiment)

Pentagon files

1

What the file claims

1
  • Unverified

    The debrief's 'unidentified' reference found in the sampled text concerns whether a hatch-closing mechanical difficulty had been diagnosed, not a UAP sighting.