Disclosed

"[CALLSIGN] (Mission) UAP"

Date
Date unknown
Place
INDOPACOM
Record
Pentagon file
Assessment
Not assessed
Evidence strength
467 case pages by decade; this one falls in Undated with 20 othersAll cases

What was reported

Uploader-titled '[CALLSIGN] (Mission) UAP', assessed by AARO as likely from a US platform in the Indo-Pacific Command area, uploaded to a classified network June 2024, no specific date recoverable. The 10-minute-48-second file is heavily processed: an '8x speed' stabilized/enhanced segment, an 'original speed' stabilized/sharpened segment, and a final 'original clip' segment whose quality progressively degrades, three different versions of the same footage bundled together.

What officials concluded

No conclusion stated

The file gives no official explanation.

Agency
Department of War
Released in

Evidence profile

Sensors1 of 9
  • No: Visual
  • Yes: Infrared
  • No: Radar
  • No: Video
  • No: Photo
  • No: Film
  • No: Audio
  • No: Night vision
  • No: Other sensor
Witnessescount not stated
  • No: Civilian
  • No: Military aircrew
  • No: Military ground
  • No: Airline crew
  • No: Sensor operator
  • No: Law enforcement
  • No: Scientist
  • No: Astronaut
  • No: Intelligence official
  • Yes: Other
Shapenot stated
  • No: Light only
  • No: Orb or sphere
  • No: Disc
  • No: Triangle
  • No: Cylinder
  • No: Cube
  • No: Other shape
Effectsnone reported
  • No: Physiological
  • No: Physical trace
  • No: Electromagnetic
  • No: Sound
  • No: Silent

Why this rating Release 2 (unlike release 1's aircrew-submitted MISREP-paired videos): these files were found by AARO on a classified network after 8 House members requested access to 51 potentially UAP-related records on 6 March 2026; AARO states many of these materials lack a substantiated chain-of-custody. Uploader-supplied titles (often dramatic: 'instant acceleration', 'Cigar Shaped', 'erratic movement') are distinct from and not confirmed by AARO's own neutral video description. Three re-processed versions of the same clip bundled together with degrading quality is a strong signal of repeated informal reprocessing rather than a controlled chain of evidence.

As described in the file

Witnesses
Unknown uploader, unverified chain of custody
Sensors
Infrared (single sensor), assessed not confirmed
Motion
Tracked, generally centered, across three re-processed versions of the same clip
Duration
10 min 48 sec, three bundled versions of the same underlying footage

Pentagon files

1

What the file claims

1
  • Unverified

    The uploader bundled three different processed versions of the same underlying clip (8x-speed enhanced, original-speed enhanced, and unenhanced original) into one file, with quality degrading over the course of the video.

On the map

10.00° N, 135.00° E, plotted at the theatre of operations named in the file

Show on the map