Disclosed

Unresolved UAP Report, Syria, October 2024

Date
20 Oct 2024
Place
Syria (37S grid, AFSOC AC-130 gunship platform)
Record
Pentagon file
Assessment
Not assessed
Evidence strength
467 case pages by decade; this one falls in 2020s with 169 othersAll cases

What was reported

Five seconds of FMV video, one of three released clips (with PR032, PR033) from a single AFSOC AC-130 UAP event on mission report DOW-UAP-D032. The mission report's own structured fields describe a 'misshapen and uneven ball of white light' and a 'light/glare halo effect' at the top of the feed, categorize the object's physical state as 'Plasma', and record the aircrew's explicit judgment that it was NOT a lasing event; overall assessed benign with no mission impact.

What officials concluded

Tentative explanation

Aircrew categorized the object's physical state as 'Plasma', explicitly assessed it as benign light/glare, and stated their own judgment that it was not a laser illumination event; no persistent tracked object, only recurring light/glare…

Agency
Department of War
Released in

Evidence profile

Sensors1 of 9
  • No: Visual
  • Yes: Infrared
  • No: Radar
  • No: Video
  • No: Photo
  • No: Film
  • No: Audio
  • No: Night vision
  • No: Other sensor
Witnesses130 counted
  • No: Civilian
  • Yes: Military aircrew
  • No: Military ground
  • No: Airline crew
  • No: Sensor operator
  • No: Law enforcement
  • No: Scientist
  • No: Astronaut
  • No: Intelligence official
  • No: Other
ShapeOrb or sphere
  • No: Light only
  • Yes: Orb or sphere
  • No: Disc
  • No: Triangle
  • No: Cylinder
  • No: Cube
  • No: Other shape
Effectsnone reported
  • No: Physiological
  • No: Physical trace
  • No: Electromagnetic
  • No: Sound
  • No: Silent

Why this rating Single FMV sensor; the source document itself describes recurring light/glare crossing the camera rather than a persistently tracked solid object, categorizes the physical state as 'Plasma' (i.e. a light/energy phenomenon, not a craft), and the aircrew's own account is consistent with a lens flare, glare, or similar optical/sensor artifact, explicitly considered and distinguished only from lasing, not from mundane glare.

As described in the file

Witnesses
One AFSOC AC-130 aircrew (12 SOS), unnamed, redacted
Sensors
FMV camera (single sensor)
Shape
Misshapen and uneven ball of white light; light/glare halo effect at top of frame
Lights and colour
White light, light/glare
Motion
No maneuverability observed
Duration
Light/glare events recurred at 1559Z, 1602Z, 1620Z, 1644Z over an 85-minute window; this clip 5 seconds
Altitude or range
Aircraft at 20,088 ft, orbiting, 144 knots
Effects
UAP Effects on Persons: NO; UAP Effects on Equipment: not stated as impacting

Pentagon files

1

What the file claims

2
  • Unverified

    The mission report categorizes the UAP's physical state as 'Plasma' and describes it as a misshapen, uneven ball of white light with a light/glare halo at the top of the FMV feed.

  • Unverified

    The aircrew explicitly considered and ruled out that the glare was a laser illumination (lasing) event, and judged the encounter to have no mission impact.

On the map

35.00° N, 38.00° E, plotted at the centre of the country

Show on the map